<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>whether-or-not &#8211; Indian Pro Wrestling Base</title>
	<atom:link href="/tag/whether-or-not/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>/</link>
	<description>Your Daily Source to Wrestling News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2017 21:36:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Bold Potential Finishes To The Summerslam Main Event</title>
		<link>/bold-potential-finishes-to-the-summerslam-main-event/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2017 21:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UFC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WWE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barclays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[championship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[excitement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heyman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samoan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shocking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whether-or-not]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WrestleMania]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/bold-potential-finishes-to-the-summerslam-main-event/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[...]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[</p>
<p>A beast incarnate, a Samoan machine, a big dog and a monster among men &#8211; a.k.a the Summerslam main event. Excitement for this match is understandably through the roof. At any rate these men will hopefully &#8211; and likely will &#8211; tear the roof off of the Barclays Centre.</p>
<p>The most intriguing part of this match-up is Brock Lesnar possibly leaving WWE. In the event that Lesnar loses his championship this Sunday, Heyman is promising the pair will leave WWE. With the rumours of Lesnar returning to UFC to face Jon Jones this is a massive stipulation. However the expectation is for Lesnar to retain his title this Sunday and remain with WWE until at least Wrestlemania. Furthering the intrigue though is the revelation that WWE is keeping the finish of the match completely under wraps. That itself leaves many possibilities in place. It also adds an aspect of doubt to whether or not Lesnar will actually retain his belt. For me that only makes this match that little bit more exciting.</p>
<p>With that this article looks at a few bold potential finishes to that very match. As a disclaimer these are not predictions just some bold possibilities. For my Summerslam 2017 match predictions check out my article below!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ringsidenews.com/2017/08/17/predicting-winners-match-summerslam/">http://www.ringsidenews.com/2017/08/17/predicting-winners-match-summerslam/</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ringsidenews.com/2017/08/18/bold-potential-finishes-summerslam-main-event/">Bold Potential Finishes To The Summerslam Main Event</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ringsidenews.com/">Wrestling News &amp; WWE News, Rumors &amp; Spoilers</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GFW’s Attempts to Trademark “BROKEN” Gimmick Refused</title>
		<link>/gfws-attempts-to-trademark-broken-gimmick-refused/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jul 2017 17:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UFC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WWE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[between-the-two]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brother Nero]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gfw news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[initial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whether-or-not]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wrestling]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/gfws-attempts-to-trademark-broken-gimmick-refused/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[...]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[</p>
<p>PWInsider reports that all four Broken Universe-related trademarks that were filed by Global Force Wrestling have be given an initial refusal by the United States Patent &#038; Trademark Office for a variety of reasons.</p>
<p>Matt Hardy filed for the &#8220;Broken Matt Hardy&#8221; trademark first, which the United States Patent &#038; Trademark Office could see as confusing similar. Global Force Wrestling will need to prove there is no conflict between the two and will also need to indicate whether &#8220;Broken Matt&#8221; refers to a living person. Matt will have to sign off on it if it does.</p>
<p>&#8220;Brother Nero&#8221; was refused because GFW failed to indicate whether or not it was to identify a living person. They will need the consent of Jeff Hardy if it does.</p>
<p>&#8220;Broken Brilliance&#8221; was refused because Global Force Wrestling failed to specify whether or not the term has any significance in professional wrestling or if it is just a &#8220;term of art&#8221; in the wrestling business.</p>
<p>&#8220;Vanguard1&#8221; was refused because it is confusingly similar to a non wrestling-related trademark.</p>
<p>It was also noted that all four trademarks were also refused because it was ruled that the wordings used for identification and classification of goods and services in the initial filing were too broad, thus the USPTO ruled those filings needed additional clarification. </p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ringsidenews.com/2017/07/30/gfws-attempts-trademark-broken-gimmick-refused/">GFW&#8217;s Attempts to Trademark &#8220;BROKEN&#8221; Gimmick Refused</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ringsidenews.com/">Wrestling News &amp; WWE News, Rumors &amp; Spoilers</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
